Debunking supplement and aromatherapy myths

It seems like a day doesn’t go by that I don’t get another solicitation for fancy-schmancy energy drinks (such as Lance Armstrong’s FRS) containing exotic ingredients such as Quercetin, or encounter more ladies’ magazine fluff articles about the supposed benefits of aromatherapy.

Aromatherapy: NOUN, fancy, scientific sounding word developed to sell people silly smelly things they don’t need. A marketing ploy.

In my latest UC Berkeley Wellness Letter, December 2009, there is an article asking the question: ‘Aromatherapy: does it work even if it doesn’t?’

The bottom line: NO.

Click to read more ...

Sunscreen: less is actually more

According to the latest issue ( August 2009) of the UC Berkeley Wellness Letter, you shouldn’t get sucked in by super duper high suncreens with SPF values of 70 to 100. The difference is tiny, with an SPF of 40 providing 97% protection and a SPF of 80 providing 99% protection.

The key with any sunscreen is to apply it liberally and frequently - every couple hours to achieve the rated SPF factor on the label.

You also need to remember that the SPF value doesn’t apply to UVA. Those are the really damaging rays that cause aging and contribute to skin cancer.

The article says that any SPF between 15 and 30 is just fine for most people, and if you need more protection then use something with a zinc oxide, titanium oxide, avobenzone or Mexoryl component.

Cancer patients and dietary supplements

“If you are a cancer survivor, consult your doctor about any dietary supplements you’re taking. Some research suggest that large amounts of zinc or antiocidants, for example may actually promote the recurrent of certain cancers.

Click to read more ...